BRUTUS IS A NOBLE MAN

Brutus is Caesar adopted son, Caesar loves Brutus. He gave Brutus what did Brutus deserves to but Brutus joined with Cassius to assassinate Caesar.  It seems inhumane and Brutus shouldn't kill his adopted father who is care and love him like his own son. Brutus may seem like heartless and inhuman but actually he is noble man.  He killed Caesar, he killed the animal. 

Caesar was a dictator, he killed people with no mercy, he didn't respect woman and he treats people more worst than animal. What will happen to Rome if Caesar still alive and constantly do the bad things? It would be a disaster! Rome will dirty with blood of innocent people, and Brutus loves Rome. He don’t want Rome fall for someone who is evil.  Brutus did the right thing when he killed Caesar, it’s not that he doesn't love Caesar but that is for the Rome sake.  Brutus knows that Rome will be worst if the dictator of the Roman public Julius Caesar not eliminated. Brutus is an honourable man. He killed the man who caused much death and brings harm to the Rome.

ancients behaving badly : JULIUS CAESAR

Gaius Julius Caesar is a dictator of Roman republic.   Caesar formed a political alliance that was to dominate Roman politics for several years. Caesar was a successful and he conquered everything.  He is very proud.  However all the vices committed by him were unnecessary in order to safeguard the superiority of Rome as the greatest civilization in the ancient world.  He watched tens of thousands of women and children died because of starvation. He wants to protect his army. It shows that Caesar is inhumane. He killed lots of people just because of to keep their army to do the bad things; clearly shown that he does not have the feeling of humanity to other human being. 

Moreover, he was a depraved and hideous man because he slept with many women including his friend's wives. He also asked his soldiers to slaughter the people with no mercy. How could a human act like an animal? In my opinion, Caesar was a bad ass and he supposedly being killed in other evil way.

JACK THE RIPPER - FROM HELL

In the movie From Hell, there are facts also imaginations that had been created by the filmmaker. For the murder scenes, the plots are based on facts because how the victims are being murdered in a very cruel way. There are also scenes based on filmmaker's imagination. Firstly are all the victims of Jack the ripper is closest friends. However, there is no evidence that the victims are friends even though they came from the same area.   In the film, Fredrick Abberline portrayed by johnny Deep is addicted to Opium different from the "real" Fredrick Abberline. He never takes a drug.  In the movie, Marry Kelly manages to escape from the killer. However, Mary is one of the victims.

james kelly = jack the ripper?

“Jack the Ripper" is the best-known name given to an unidentified serial killer who was active in the largely impoverished areas in and around the White chapel district of London in 1888.  Since that time, the identity of the killer or killers has been hotly debated, and over one hundred Jack the Ripper suspects have been proposed. 

 James Kelly is one of the suspects.  I don’t think that James Kelly is jack the ripper. It is because there is no concrete evidence.  He did kill his wife, but why he has to take a very long time to kill again.  Beside he is in United State when other prostitutes are killed by the real jack the ripper. Other than that is the handwriting of jack the ripper and James Kelly are different.  James Kelly is just a psycho person but he is not jack the ripper. 

affirmative action

Based on the talk show about the affirmative action, from the three guests I am choosing Ibrahim Saad.

Preposition: NEP should not be leftover in Malaysia
(this policy is to assist the poor and provide an opportunity for those who are not fortunate)

Premise 1: The policy is okay but the execution sometimes dubious.
(Yes, the higher authority might be abuse for their own interest but the poor are still helped)
Argument: The misuse of the policy
(I agreed. policy is okay but the execution sometimes dubious)
Premise 2: If NEP eliminated, people who need this policy will suffer
(Malay are minority in Penang and they need NEP to support them)
Argument: people need this policy to get rid of poverty
(nowadays Malay are still poor in economic and business.)