BRUTUS IS A NOBLE MAN

Brutus is Caesar adopted son, Caesar loves Brutus. He gave Brutus what did Brutus deserves to but Brutus joined with Cassius to assassinate Caesar.  It seems inhumane and Brutus shouldn't kill his adopted father who is care and love him like his own son. Brutus may seem like heartless and inhuman but actually he is noble man.  He killed Caesar, he killed the animal. 

Caesar was a dictator, he killed people with no mercy, he didn't respect woman and he treats people more worst than animal. What will happen to Rome if Caesar still alive and constantly do the bad things? It would be a disaster! Rome will dirty with blood of innocent people, and Brutus loves Rome. He don’t want Rome fall for someone who is evil.  Brutus did the right thing when he killed Caesar, it’s not that he doesn't love Caesar but that is for the Rome sake.  Brutus knows that Rome will be worst if the dictator of the Roman public Julius Caesar not eliminated. Brutus is an honourable man. He killed the man who caused much death and brings harm to the Rome.

ancients behaving badly : JULIUS CAESAR

Gaius Julius Caesar is a dictator of Roman republic.   Caesar formed a political alliance that was to dominate Roman politics for several years. Caesar was a successful and he conquered everything.  He is very proud.  However all the vices committed by him were unnecessary in order to safeguard the superiority of Rome as the greatest civilization in the ancient world.  He watched tens of thousands of women and children died because of starvation. He wants to protect his army. It shows that Caesar is inhumane. He killed lots of people just because of to keep their army to do the bad things; clearly shown that he does not have the feeling of humanity to other human being. 

Moreover, he was a depraved and hideous man because he slept with many women including his friend's wives. He also asked his soldiers to slaughter the people with no mercy. How could a human act like an animal? In my opinion, Caesar was a bad ass and he supposedly being killed in other evil way.

JACK THE RIPPER - FROM HELL

In the movie From Hell, there are facts also imaginations that had been created by the filmmaker. For the murder scenes, the plots are based on facts because how the victims are being murdered in a very cruel way. There are also scenes based on filmmaker's imagination. Firstly are all the victims of Jack the ripper is closest friends. However, there is no evidence that the victims are friends even though they came from the same area.   In the film, Fredrick Abberline portrayed by johnny Deep is addicted to Opium different from the "real" Fredrick Abberline. He never takes a drug.  In the movie, Marry Kelly manages to escape from the killer. However, Mary is one of the victims.

james kelly = jack the ripper?

“Jack the Ripper" is the best-known name given to an unidentified serial killer who was active in the largely impoverished areas in and around the White chapel district of London in 1888.  Since that time, the identity of the killer or killers has been hotly debated, and over one hundred Jack the Ripper suspects have been proposed. 

 James Kelly is one of the suspects.  I don’t think that James Kelly is jack the ripper. It is because there is no concrete evidence.  He did kill his wife, but why he has to take a very long time to kill again.  Beside he is in United State when other prostitutes are killed by the real jack the ripper. Other than that is the handwriting of jack the ripper and James Kelly are different.  James Kelly is just a psycho person but he is not jack the ripper. 

affirmative action

Based on the talk show about the affirmative action, from the three guests I am choosing Ibrahim Saad.

Preposition: NEP should not be leftover in Malaysia
(this policy is to assist the poor and provide an opportunity for those who are not fortunate)

Premise 1: The policy is okay but the execution sometimes dubious.
(Yes, the higher authority might be abuse for their own interest but the poor are still helped)
Argument: The misuse of the policy
(I agreed. policy is okay but the execution sometimes dubious)
Premise 2: If NEP eliminated, people who need this policy will suffer
(Malay are minority in Penang and they need NEP to support them)
Argument: people need this policy to get rid of poverty
(nowadays Malay are still poor in economic and business.) 

ALIEN ? hallucinating or what?

Its ridiculous! I am totally disagree with their claims. Small wooden bird is a proof that alien exist ? because of the shape that has wings and 'I want to fly' description prove the existence of aliens? maybe the Egyptians didn't meant its the alien but their scientist over acting by saying its because of the alien craft. for me, its just a small wooden bird, maybe the Egyptians meant its freedom. birds often associated with the freedom. 

Other than that, the stone that scattered around around the place. its irrelevant caused by the aliens. that the proof of existence of aliens? hallucinating or what? alien doesn't exist.  

  

i love you FAST FOOD

Fast food is not the main cause of obesity and all around the world. After watching ‘supersized me’, I can see that the problem comes from them. Their attitude, they taking too much fast food and did not do exercises. If they took lots of fast food but then if they do some exercise it will burned the calories and of course they will not be fat! Fast food is not the sole cause that contributing to obesity. As you all know, there is lots of factor that may lead to obesity such as lack of exercises, excessive taking of fast food without doing some exercise will absolutely making you fat. Other factor of the obesity is the genes.  Genes and behavior may both need for person to be overweight.  Other than that, some illness may lead to obesity and or weight gain.  You don’t have to be afraid taking fast food but always remember that don’t be too lazy to do exercises and stop blaming fast food.

TUN ABDUL RAZAK & DATUK SERI NAJIB

                                                                 

In my opinion our current prime minister, Datuk Seri Najib tun Abdul Razak is continuing his father legacy primarily in affirmative action.  He shows that he concern about Malaysian people by announced his campaign ‘1 Malaysia’ which is everyone is equal, it means that Malaysian people is uniting without care about races, gender, and so on.  Malaysians will gain lots of benefits by that campaign. His father, Tun Abdul Razak also work very hard to make Malaysians unite. He launched new economic policy (DEB) to help Malaysians to increase their standard of living. However he is still focusing more on Malays. Just like his son, they are both wants Malaysian lives peacefully.

GANDHI : SUCCEED OR FAILURE?

                       

Gandhi is considered as the father of Indian independence. He fights the discrimination, oppressions, injustice using the concept of non violence and want to reuniting the people of India.  He tried so hard to do that but for me, he failed. Even though he practicing non violent way to protesting against injustice but the Indians still using the violence to get the independence for their country.  Even Gandhi is killed by the Indian. It happened because of what? Not united.

Reuniting the people is not an easy task. For my opinion, to reuniting the people of India are not only depending on him but the Indians itself.  They should cooperate in making things success.  Gandhi tried his best in order to reunite the people of India.  Even though Gandhi failed to do so but without him, India will not free from British grip. India will not gain independence without this failure man.

GANDHI, A FATHER ?

In my opinion, Gandhi is responsible for the tragic end of his eldest son, but he could not be blamed for the pathetic life of Harilal that caused him to the death as a dishonorable man. Maybe sometimes Gandhi being unfair towards Harilal and make him felt sad and give up but he can’t live that way. He should not despair and always improving himself to be a better man.  Firstly, I thought that Gandhi should be blamed for neglected his own son but then I realized that yes it is his fault not giving his own son to study abroad and have better education but Harilal should be matured and have to move on without depending too much on his father. Gandhi devoted his life to India and had sacrifice lots of thing. As a son, he should understand and have to be strong so it won’t lead himself to a destructive life. Gandhi can’t be blamed for the tragic end of his son, Harilal.

SHERLOCK HOLMES : EMPATHY TYPE?

"Don't make people into heroes, John. Heroes don't exist. And if they did, I wouldn't be one of them."-Sherlock Holmes

“I am not a psychopath, I’m a high functioning sociopath!”        

Sherlock Holmes, a detective who is briliant and attentive to details is actually a sociopath plus empathy man. Even he is always care to the victims whom are involved in the crime cases which he handled, sometimes his insensitivity does hurts his colleagues by making fun in his ridiculous ways.  Maybe that is the way he make jokes (well, he is not a sociable type - not good at joke!).

Even he is rude, he is deeply intact with his emotion when he at his helping hands towards John (flat mate cum colleague) who often seek assistance whilst doing his routine even when John in a deep s*#t. The other two friends Holmes do care a lot besides John is Hudson and Lestrade. 

For me, sometimes an empathy man type do like play a girlie music instruments, LOL. Do not be surprised, Holmes played violin! He even composed music! 

His disorder mood makes me hard to guess whether he is empathy or sociopath.

I would rather say Sherlock Holmes is man of mix of both and that makes him to be remembered as one of the great character in fiction world!

 

Eureka Moment While Watching TEST YOUR BRAIN

1st Game:

I thought I am giving all my focus on that first game, well, I have been deceived.  My focus is all about the dollars.  I guessed that something might change or happened when the dollars were flipped. Damn. Nothing happened.  When the narrator explained by showing step by step of the scenes, then I realized that, there were changes happened but not about the money.  The background, the hat and the handkerchief were switched.  Yes, I am been fooled.

2nd Game:

Not even two changes I have spotted the differences when the scene changes.  I am focusing on too much; meaning I cannot focused at all when scene turned black on and off. I believed that I am in what Mr. Dan mentioned just now as change blindness.  What he said is true, people focuses in what counts.  People put their attention on what there have been spotlighted.

3rd Game:

At first, I didn't expect the other man was underneath the table. I thought the second man was the same with the one that greet the first guy. Well, actually I had failed to notice and not aware of the surroundings. Peoples failed to spot the switched because they not expecting something to occurred so sudden like in the 3rd game.

4th Game:

I am managed to count two items stolen.  I did not realize wallet and mobile phone were silently taken from   the bearded guy.  I was deceived by the movement of Mr. Apollo. He moves around the guy frequently and his hands moved fast as he talked.  It was deceiving and stole my attention he tries to steal items from that guy.